The University of Arizona

Payments for environmental services, gendered livelihoods and forest management in Vietnam: a feminist political ecology perspective

Wouter Tuijnman, Mucahid M Bayrak, Pham Xuan Hung, Bui Duc Tinh

Abstract


Economic approaches to combat environmental degradation and deforestation have resulted in development initiatives such as the Payment for Environmental Services program (PES). This study deals with the effects of PES on women's livelihoods in Thuong Lo commune, Central Vietnam. Employing a feminist political ecology perspective and adopting a qualitative approach, we analyze the gendered roles, responsibilities and effects of PES on local livelihoods. We found that the women in our study portrayed different preferences and knowledge in relation to PES, forest management and livelihoods. Women are often excluded in PES projects due to a range of various socio-cultural factors.

Keywords: Payments for Environmental Services; forest management; gender; women's empowerment; livelihoods; Central Vietnam; Co Tu people


Full Text:

PDF

References


Agarwal, B. 1992. The gender and environment debate: lessons from India. Feminist Studies 18(1): 119–58.

Agarwal, B. 1997. Bargaining and gender relations: within and beyond the household. Feminist Economics 3(1): 1–51.

Agarwal, B. 2000. Conceptualising environmental collective action: why gender matters. Cambridge Journal of Economics 24(3): 283–310.

Agarwal, B. 2001. Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender: an analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework. World Development 29(10): 1623–1648.

Agarwal, B. 2009. Gender and forest conservation: the impact of women's participation in community forest governance. Ecological Economics 68(11): 2785–2799.

Arhem, N. 2010. In the sacred forest: landscape, livelihood and spirit beliefs among the Katu of Vietnam. Göteborg: Göteborg University.

Ban, N.C., M. Mills, J. Tam, C.C. Hicks, S. Klain, N. Stoeckl, M.C. Bottrill, J. Levine, R.L. Pressey, T. Satterfield and K.M. Chan. 2013. A social–ecological approach to conservation planning: embedding social considerations. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11(4): 194–202.

Bayon, R. 2004. Making environmental markets work: lessons from early experience with sulfur, carbon, wetlands, and other related markets. Washington D.C.: Forest Trends. Available online: https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/handle/10919/66848

Bayrak, M. 2019. State of forest governance in Vietnam: where are the local communities? In H. James (ed.). Population, development and the environment - Challenges to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals in Asia Pacific. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Pp 273-295.

Bayrak, M.M., T.N. Tran and P. Burgers. 2013. Restructuring space in the name of development: the socio-cultural impact of the Forest Land Allocation Program on the indigenous Co Tu people in Central Vietnam. Journal of Political Ecology 20: 37-52.

Bebbington, A.J. 2000. Reencountering development: livelihood transitions and place transformations in the Andes. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90(3): 495–520.

Bob, U. 2000. Gender, the role of the chieftaincy and rural women's access to land under the land reform programme in KwaZulu-Natal. Alternation 7(2): 48–66.

Bowles, S. 2008. Policies designed for self-interested citizens may undermine 'the moral sentiments': Evidence from economic experiments. Science 320: 1605–1609.

Brown, H.C.P. 2011. Gender, climate change and REDD+ in the Congo Basin forests of Central Africa. International Forestry Review 13(2): 163-176. Available online: https://www.cifor.org/library/3534/

Burling, R. 1963. Rengsanggri: family and kinship in a Garo village. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Butler, J. 1990. Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.

Chan, K.M.A, A.D. Guerry, P. Balvanera, S. Klain, T. Satterfield, X. Basurto, A. Bostrom, R. Chuenpagdee, R. Gould, B.S. Halpern, N. Hannahs, J Levine, B. Norton, M. Ruckelshaus, R. Russell, J. Tam and U. Woodside. 2012. Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement. BioScience 62(8): 744–756.

Chaudhuri. T. 2013. From policing to 'social fencing': shifting moral economies of biodiversity conservation in a South Indian Tiger Reserve . Journal of Political Ecology 20: 376-394.

Coleman, E.A. and E. Mwangi. 2013. Women's participation in forest management: a cross-country analysis. Global Environmental Change 23(1): 193-205.

Di Chiro, G. 2008. Living environmentalisms: coalition politics, social reproduction, and environmental justice. Environmental Politics 17(2): 276–298.

Escobar, A. 1996. Construction nature: elements for a post-structuralist political ecology. Futures 28(4): 325-343.

Escobar, A. 1998. Whose knowledge, whose nature? Biodiversity, conservation, and the political ecology of social movements. Journal of Political Ecology 5: 53-82.

Francis, E. 2000. Making a living: changing livelihoods in Rural Africa. London: Routledge.

Gómez-Baggethun, E., R. De Groot, P.L. Lomas and C. Montes. 2010. The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecological Economics 69(6): 1209-1218.

Haas, J.H., L. Loft and T.T. Pham. 2019. How fair can incentive-based conservation get? The interdependence of distributional and contextual equity in Vietnam's payments for Forest Environmental Services program. Ecological Economics 160: 205-214.

Harcourt, W. 2017. Gender and sustainable livelihoods: linking gendered experiences of environment, community and self. Agriculture and Human Values 34: 1007-1019.

Harcourt, W. and I.L. Nelson (eds.). 2015. Practicing feminist political ecologies: moving beyond the "green economy." London: Zed.

Harris, L.M. 2015. Hegemonic water and rethinking natures otherwise. In W. Harcourt and I.L. Nelson (eds.). Practicing feminist political ecologies: moving beyond the "green economy." London: Zed Books. Pp. 157-181.

Hoang, V.C. 2016. Danh sách cán bộ tham gia kiểm tra lấn chiếm, do dạc lập bản tại hiện trường [List of participants for forest protection] Unpublished report. Thuong Lo: Thuong Lo Commune Government Vietnam.

Hovorka, A.J. 2006. The No. 1 ladies' poultry farm: a feminist political ecology of urban agriculture in Botswana. Gender, Place and Culture 13(3): 207–225.

Howard, P. 2003. The major importance of 'minor' resources: women and plant biodiversity. Gatekeeper 112. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.

Jewitt, S. 2019. Environment, knowledge and gender: local development in India's Jharkhand. London: Routledge.

Kariuki, J. and R. Birner, 2016. Are market-based conservation schemes gender-blind? a qualitative study of three cases from Kenya. Society and Natural Resources 29(4): 432-447.

King, B.H. 2007. Developing KaNgwane: geographies of segregation and integration in the New South Africa. The Geographical Journal 173(1): 13–25.

King, B.H. 2011. Spatialising livelihoods: resource access and livelihood spaces in South Africa. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 36(2): 297–313.

Kinzig, A.P., P.R. Ehrlich, L.J. Alston, K. Arrow, S. Barrett, T.G. Buchman, G.C. Daily, B. Levin, S. Levin, M. Oppenheimer, E. Ostrom and D. Saari. 2013. Social norms and global environmental challenges: The complex interaction of behaviors, values, and policy. BioScience 63(3): 164–175.

Kumar, P. (ed.). 2010. The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations. London: Earthscan.

Larson, A.M., T. Dokken, A.E. Duchelle, S. Atmadja, I.A.P. Resosudarmo, P. Cronkleton, M. Cromberg, W. Sunderlin, A. Awono and G. Selaya. 2015. The role of women in early REDD+ implementation: lessons for future engagement. International Forestry Review 17(1): 43-65.

Lipton, M. (ed.). 1996. Land, labour and livelihoods in rural South Africa (Vol 1). Durban: University of Natal, Indicator Press.

McCusker, B. and A.M. Oberhauser. 2006. An assessment of women's access to natural resources through communal projects in South Africa. GeoJournal 66: 325–339.

McElwee, P.D. 2016. Forests are gold: trees, people and environmental rule in Vietnam. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

Menon, A. and N. Rai. 2019. The mismeasure of nature: the political ecology of economic valuation of Tiger Reserves in India. Journal of Political Ecology 26: 652-665.

Muradian, R., E. Corbera, U. Pascual, N. Kosoy and P.H. May. 2010. Reconciling theory and practice: An alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics 69(6): 1202-1208.

Mwangi, E., R. Meinzen-Dick and Y. Sun. 2011. Gender and sustainable forest management in East Africa and Latin America. Ecology and Society: 16(1): 17.

Nightingale, A. 2002. Participating or just sitting in? The dynamics of gender and caste in community forestry. Journal of Forest and Livelihood 2(1): 17-24.

Oberhauser, A.M. 2016. (Re)constructing rural–urban spaces: gendered livelihoods, migration, and natural resources in South Africa. GeoJournal 81(3): 489–502.

Pham, T.T., K. Bennett, T.P. Vu, J. Brunner, N.D. Le and D.T. Nguyen. 2013. Payments for forest environmental services in Vietnam: from policy to practice. Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). Available online: https://www.cifor.org/library/4247/

Pham, T.T., G.Y. Wong, N.D. Le and M. Brockhaus. 2016. The distribution of payment for forest environmental services (PFES) in Vietnam: Research evidence to inform payment guidelines. CIFOR Occasional Paper no. 163. Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). Available online: https://www.cifor.org/library/6297/

Phuc, N.Q., T.V. Hoa, P.X. Hung and P.T.T. Tam. 2011. Competitive ability of agricultural products in Central Vietnam: a case study of rubber products in Thua Thien Hue Province. Hue University Journal of Science 68(5): 99-108.

Phuc, X.T., W.H. Dressler, S. Mahanty, T.T. Pham and C. Zingerli. 2012. The prospects for payment for ecosystem services (PES) in Vietnam: A look at three payment schemes. Human Ecology 40(2): 237-249.

Radel, C. 2012. Gendered livelihoods and the politics of socio-environmental identity: women's participation in conservation projects in Calakmul, Mexico. Gender, Place and Culture 19(1): 61–82.

Redpath, S.M., J. Young, A. Evely, W.M Adams, W.J. Sutherland, A. Whitehouse, A. Amar, R.A. Lambert, J.D. Linnell, A. Watt and R.J. Gutierrez. 2013. Understanding and managing conservation conflicts. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 28(2): 100–109.

Resureccion, B.P. and R. Elmhirst (eds.). 2012. Gender and natural resource management: livelihoods, mobility and interventions. London: Earthscan.

Rocheleau, D. and P. Nirmal. 2015. Feminist political ecologies: grounded, networked and rooted on earth. In R. Baksh and W. Harcourt (eds.). The Oxford handbook of transnational feminist movements. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 793-814.

Rocheleau, D., B. Thomas-Slayter and E. Wangari (eds.). 1996. Feminist political ecology: global issues and local experiences. London: Routledge.

Roy, S.B., R. Mukherjee, D.S Roy, P. Bhattacharya and R.K Bhadra. 1993. Profile of forest protection committees of Sarugarh Range, North Bengal. IBRAD Working Paper No 16. Calcutta: Indian Institute of Bio-Social Research and Development.

Sarin, M. 1998. Who is gaining? Who is losing? Gender and equality concerns in joint forest management. New Delhi: Society for Promotion of Wasteland Development.

Schwartz, G.J. 2017. The role of women in payment for environmental services programs in Osa, Costa Rica. Gender, Place and Culture 24(6): 890–910.

Scoones, I. 2009. Livelihoods perspectives and rural development. The Journal of Peasant Studies 36(1): 171–96.

Sen, A. 2001. Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Shackleton, S., B. Campbell, H. Lotz-Sisitka and C. Shackleton. 2008. Links between the local trade in natural products, livelihoods and poverty alleviation in a semi-arid region of South Africa. World Development 36(3): 505–526.

Shackleton, S., F. Paumgarten, H. Kassa, M. Husselman and M. Zida. 2011. Opportunities for enhancing poor women's socioeconomic empowerment in the value chains of three African non-timber forest products (NTFPs). International Forestry Review 13(2): 136-151. Available online: https://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/articles/AShackleton1101.pdf

Shah, M.K. and P. Shah. 1995. Gender, environment and livelihood security: an alternative viewpoint from India. IDS Bulletin 26(1): 75–82.

Shiva, V. 1989. Staying alive: women, ecology and development. London: Zed.

Shiva, V. 1992. Women's indigenous knowledge and biodiversity conservation. India International Centre Quarterly 19(1/2): 205-214.

Suhardiman, D., D. Wichelns, G. Lestrelin and C. Thai Hoanh. 2013. Payments for ecosystem services in Vietnam: market-based incentives or state control of resources? Ecosystem Services 5: 94–101.

Tinh, B.D. and B.D. The. 2013. Assessing marginalized communities' vulnerability to climate change in Thua Thien Hue. Hue University Journal of Science 80(2): 209-219.

Trædal, L.T., P.O. Vedeld and J.G. Pétursson. 2016. Analyzing the transformations of forest PES in Vietnam: implications for REDD+. Forest Policy and Economics 62: 109–117.

Truong, K.T.H. and P. H. Truong. 2016. Kế hoạch tổ chức đi hiện trường đo đạc diện tích rừng bị lấn chiếm theo chỉ thị 65/2015/CT-UBND của UBND Tỉnh Thừa Thiên Huế. [Organizing field trips to measure encroached forest areas according to directive 65/2015/CT-UBND of Thua Thien Hue province] Unpublished report. Thuong Lo: Thuong Lo Commune Government Vietnam.

Wichterich, C. 2015. Contesting green growth, connecting care, commons and enough. In W. Harcourt and I. L. Nelson (eds.). Practicing feminist political ecologies: moving beyond the "green economy." London: Zed. Pp. 67-100.

Wunder, S. 2005. Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts. Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). Available online: https://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/OccPapers/OP-42.pdf

Wunder, S. 2007. The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation. Conservation Biology 21(1): 48-58.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.2458/v27i1.23643