The University of Arizona

Imposing legality: hegemony and resistance under the EU Forest Law Enforcement, Governance, and Trade (FLEGT) initiative

Rodd Myers, Rebecca L Rutt, Constance McDermott, Ahmad Maryudi, Emmanuel Acheampong, Marisa Camargo, Hoàng Cầm


Timber legality trade restrictions and verification are a bundle of contemporary mechanisms triggered by global concerns about forest degradation and deforestation. The European Union Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade initiative is a significant effort to not only screen out illegal timber and wood products from the EU, but also support trading partner countries to improve their legality definitions and verification processes. But by using bilateral agreements (Voluntary Partnership Agreements) as a key mechanism, the EU legitimizes trade partner nation-states as the authority to decide what is legal. We engage in a theoretical debate about the complexities of the meaning of legality, and then analyze empirical data collected from interviews in Ghana, Indonesia, Vietnam and Europe with policy, civil society and industry actors to understand how different actors understand legality. We find hegemonic notions of Westphalian statehood at the core of 'global' notions of legality and often contrast with local understandings of legality. Non-state actors understand these hegemonic notions of legality as imposed upon them and part of a colonial legacy. Further, notions of legality that fail to conform with hegemonic understandings are readily framed by nation-states as immoral or criminal. We emphasize the importance of understanding these framings to elucidate the embedded assumptions about what comprises legality within assemblages of global actors.

Key words: FLEGT, timber legality, hegemony, power, globalization

Full Text:



Abrams, J., E. Nielsen, D. Diaz, T. Selfa, E. Adams, J.L. Dunn, and C. Moseley. 2018. How do states benefit from nonstate governance? Evidence from forest sustainability certification. Global Environmental Politics 18:3: 66-85.

Acheampong, E. and E. Marfo. 2011. The impact of tree tenure and access on chainsaw milling in Ghana. Ghana Journal of Forestry 27: 68-86.

Acheampong, E. and E. Marfo. 2014. Chainsaw operators, alternative livelihood options and climate change mitigation. Kumasi: CSIR Forestry Research Institute of Ghana.

Arora-Jonsson, S., L. Westholm, B.J. Temu and A. Petitt. 2016. Carbon and cash in climate assemblages: the making of a new global citizenship. Antipode 48(1): 74-96.

Basnyat, B., T. Treue, R.K. Pokharel, L.N. Lamsal and S. Rayamajhi. 2018. Legal-sounding bureaucratic re- centralisation of community forestry in Nepal. Forest Policy and Economics 91: 5-18.

Becker, L.C. 2001. Seeing green in Mali's woods: colonial legacy, forest use, and local control. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. Association of American Geographers 91(3): 504-526.

Bello, W.F., S. Cunningham and B. Rau. 1994. Dark victory: the United States, structural adjustment, and global poverty. London: Pluto.

von Benda-Beckmann, F., K. von Benda-Beckmann and A. Griffiths. 2012. The power of law. In F. von Benda-Beckmann, K. von Benda-Beckmann and A. Griffiths (eds.). The power of law in a transnational world: anthropological enquiries. New York: Berghahn Books. Pp. 1-32.

von Benda-Beckmann, K. 2002. Globalization and legal pluralism. International Law Forum 4(1): 19-25.

Bernstein, S. and B. Cashore. 2012. Complex global governance and domestic policies: four pathways of influence. International Affairs 88(3): 585-604.

Black, H.C. 1990. Black's law dictionary. 6th ed. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co.

Brockington, D., R. Duffy and J. Igoe. 2008. Nature unbound: conservation, capitalism and the future of protected areas. London: Earthscan.

Bull, H. 1977. The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Bull, H. and A. Watson. 1984. The expansion of international society. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Câm, H., C. McDermott and R. Myers. forthcoming. From global justice to local [in]justice: timber market mechanisms, legality and politics of justice in Vietnam. Journal of Vietnamese Cultural Studies 2.

Caporaso, J.A. 1996. The European Union and forms of state: Westphalian, regulatory or post‐modern? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 34(1): 29-52.

Cashore, B., G. Auld and D. Newsom. 2004. Governing through markets: forest certification and the emergence of non-state authority. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Cashore, B., S. Leipold, P.O. Cerutti, G. Bueno, S. Carodenuto, X. Chen, W. de Jong, A. Denvir, C. Hansen, D. Humphreys, K. McGinley, I. Nathan, C. Overdevest, R.J. Rodrigues, M. Sotirov, M.W. Stone, Y. T. Tegegne, I. Visseren-Hamakers, G. Winkel, V. Yemelin and J. Zeitlin. 2016. Global governance approaches to addressing illegal logging: uptake and lessons learnt. In D. Kleinschmit, S. Mansourian, C. Wildburger and A. Purret (eds.). Illegal logging and related timber trade – dimensions, drivers, impacts and responses. a global scientific rapid response assessment report. IUFRO. Pp.119-132.

Cashore, B. and M.W. Stone. 2012. Can legality verification rescue global forest governance? Analyzing the potential of public and private policy intersection to ameliorate forest challenges in Southeast Asia. Forest Policy and Economics 18 (May): 13-22.

Casson, A. and K. Obidzinski. 2002. From new order to regional autonomy: shifting dynamics of" illegal" logging in Kalimantan, Indonesia. World Development 30: 2133-2151.

Chomba, S., J. Kariuki, J.F. Lund and F. Sinclair. 2016. Roots of inequity: how the implementation of REDD+ reinforces past injustices. Land Use Policy 50: 202-213.

Claire Cutler, A. 2001. Critical reflections on the Westphalian assumptions of international law and organization: a crisis of legitimacy. Kokusaigaku Revyu = Obirin Review of International Studises 27(2): 133-150.

Colchester, M., M. Boscolo, A. Contreras-Hermosilla, F. Del Gatto, J. Dempsey, G. Lescuyer, K. Obidzinski, D. Pommier, M. Richards, S.N. Sembiring, L. Tacconi, M.T.V. Rios and A. Wells. 2006. Justice in the forest: rural livelihoods and forest law enforcement Vol. 3. Forest Perspectives. Bogor: CIFOR.

Commission of European Communities. 2003. Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT): Proposal for an EU Action Plan: Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. COM (Commission of the European Communities). Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

Cooke, B. and U. Kothari. 2001. Participation: the new tyranny? London: Zed.

David, R. and J.E.C. Brierley. 1978. Major legal systems in the world today: an introduction to the comparative study of law. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Dawson, N., B. Coolsaet and A. Martin. 2018. Justice and equity: emerging research and policy approaches to address ecosystem service trade-offs. In K. Schreckenberg, G. Mace and M. Poudyal (eds.). Ecosystem services and poverty alleviation. London: Routledge. Pp. 22-38.

DeFries, R.S., T. Rudel, M. Uriarte and M. Hansen. 2010. Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the Twenty-First century. Nature Geoscience 3 (February 7): 178.

Diaw, M.C. 2005. Modern economic theory and the challenge of embedded tenure institutions: African attempts to reform local forest policies. In S. Kant and R.A. Berry (eds.). Institutions, sustainability, and natural resources. Dordrecht: Springer. Pp. 43-81.

Dingwerth, K. 2008. Private transnational governance and the developing world: a comparative perspective. International Studies Quarterly 52: 607-634.

Djelic, M.-L. and K. Sahlin-Andersson. 2006. Introduction: a world of governance: the rise of transnational regulation. In M.-L. Djelic and K. Sahlin-Andersson (eds.). Transnational governance: institutional dynamics of regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 1-30.

Duffy, R. 2010. Nature crime: how we're getting conservation wrong. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Duffy, R. 2013. Global environmental governance and North-South dynamics: the case of the CITES. Environment and Planning. C: Government and Policy 31(2): 222-239.

Eagleton, T. 1991. Ideology: an introduction. London: Verso.

EU FLEGT Facility. 2009. What is a Voluntary Partnership Agreement? - the European Union approach. Policy Brief 3.

EU FLEGT Facility. 2019. Where we work. EU FLEGT Facility.

European Parliament and Council. 2010. EC 995/2010.

European Parliament and Council. 2010. EC 995/2010.

Federer, W.J. 2004. Treasury of Presidential quotations. St. Louis: Amerisearch.

Fraser, N. 2005a. Reframing justice in a globalizing world. New Left Review 36: November-December.: 69-88.

Fraser, N. 2005b. Reframing justice. Amsterdam: Koninklijke van Gorcum.

Fraser, N. 2009. Scales of justice: reimagining political space in a globalizing world. New York: Columbia University Press.

Grove, R.H. 1996. Green imperialism: colonial expansion, tropical island edens and the origins of environmentalism, 1600-1860. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hansen, C.P. and J.F. Lund. 2017. Imagined forestry: the history of the scientific management of Ghana's High Forest Zone. Environment and History 23(1): 3-38.

Hansen, C.P., R. Rutt and E. Acheampong. 2018. 'Experimental' or business as usual? implementing the European Union Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT) Voluntary Partnership Agreement in Ghana. Forest Policy and Economics 96: 75-82.

van Heeswijk, L. and E. Turnhout. 2013. The discursive structure of FLEGT (Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade): the negotiation and interpretation of legality in the EU and Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics 32: 6-13.

Hirons, M., C. McDermott, R. Asare, A. Morel, E. Robinson, J. Mason, E. Biyd, Y. Malhi and K. Norris. 2018. Illegality and inequity in Ghana's cocoa-forest landscape: the role of formalization. Land Use Policy 76: 405-413.

Humphreys, D. 2004. Redefining the issues: NGO influence on international forest negotiations. Global Environmental Politics 4(2): 51-74.

Humphreys, D. 2006. Logjam: deforestation and the crisis of global governance. London: Earthscan.

Hurrell, A. 2002. Foreword to the Third Edition. In H. Bull (ed.). The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Pp. vii-xxiii.

Interpol. 2017. Project Leaf: global forestry assessment. Interpol.

Johnson, M.F. 2019. Who governs here? informal resource extraction, state enforcement, and conflict in Ghana. Global Environmental Change 58: 101959. Advance online publication.

Keene, E. 2002. Beyond the anarchical society: Grotius, colonialism and order in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Keohane, R.O. 1984. After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Kissinger, G.M., M. Herold and V. De Sy. 2012. Drivers of deforestation and forest degradation: a synthesis report for REDD+ policymakers. Lexeme Consulting.

Krasner, S.D. 1999. Globalization and sovereignty. In D.A. Smith, D.J. Solinger and S.C. Topik (eds.). States and sovereignty in the global economy. London: Routledge. Pp. 34-52.

Krasner, S.D. 2001. Rethinking the sovereign state model. Kokusaigaku Revyu = Obirin Review of International Studies 27(5): 17-42.

Lescuyer, G., P.O. Cerutti and V. Robiglio. 2013. Artisanal chainsaw milling to support decentralized management of timber in Central Africa? An analysis through the theory of access. Forest Policy and Economics 32: 68-77.

Lesniewska, F. and C.L. McDermott. 2014. FLEGT VPAs: laying a pathway to sustainability via legality lessons from Ghana and Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics 48: 16-23.

Lund, J.F., R.L. Rutt and J. Ribot. 2018. Trends in research on forestry decentralization policies. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 32: 17-22.

Marfo, E. 2009. Chainsaw milling in Ghana: an overview of the issues. Kumasi: Tropenbos International and CSIR Forestry Research Institute of Ghana.

Marks, G. 1992. Structural policy in the European Community. In A. Sbragia (ed.). Euro-politics: institutions and policymaking in the "new" European Community. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Pp. 191-224.

Maryudi, A. 2015. Rejim politik kehutanan internasional. Yogyakarta: UGM Press.

Maryudi, A., E. Acheampong, R. Rutt, R. Myers and C. McDermott. 2020. "A level playing field"? – what an environmental justice lens can tell us about who gets leveled in the Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade Action Plan. Society and Natural Resources 3(1): 1-17.

Maryudi, A. and R. Myers. 2018. Renting legality: how FLEGT is reinforcing power relations in Indonesian furniture production networks. Geoforum 97: 46-53.

Maryudi, A. and M.A.K. Sahide. 2017. Research trend: power analyses in polycentric and multi-level forest governance. Forest Policy and Economics 81: 65-68.

Masiero, M., D. Pettenella and P. Cerutti. 2015. Legality constraints: the emergence of a dual market for tropical timber products? Forests 6(10): 3452-3482.

McDermott, C.L. 2014. REDDuced: From sustainability to legality to units of carbon—the search for common interests in international forest governance. Environmental Science and Policy 35: 12-19.

McDermott, C.L., M. Hirons and A. Setyowati. 2019. The interplay of global governance with domestic and local access: insights from the FLEGT VPAs in Ghana and Indonesia. Society and Natural Resources 33(2): 261-279.

McElwee, P. 2004. You say illegal, I say legal: the relationship between 'illegal' logging and land tenure, poverty and forest use rights in Vietnam. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 19(1/2/3): 97–135.

McMichael, P. 2005. Global development and the corporate food regime. In Buttel, F. H. and P. McMichael (eds.). New directions in the sociology of global development. Bingley: Emerald. Pp. 265-299.

Milanovic, B. 2003. The two faces of globalization: against globalization as we know it. World Development 31(40): 667-683.

Montouroy, Y. 2013. The EU FLEGT Action Plan to Counter Illegal Logging: recentralization of European rule making, international cooperation and privatized global forest governance. 1rst ICPP 2013. ICPP. Grenoble: 26-28 June 2013.

Mwangi, E. and A. Wardell. 2012. Multi-level governance of forest resources. International Journal of the Commons 6(2).

Myers, R., D. Intarini, M. Sirait and A. Maryudi. 2017. Claiming the forest: inclusions and exclusions under Indonesia's 'new' forest policies on customary forests. Land Use Policy 66: 205–213.

Myers, R. and M. Muhajir. 2015. Searching for justice: rights vs 'benefits' in Bukit Baka Bukit Raya National Park, Indonesia. Conservation and Society 13(4): 370-381.

Nader, L. 2009. Law and the frontiers of illegalities. In von Benda- Beckman F., K. von Benda-Beckman and A. Griffiths (eds.). The power of law in a transnational world. New York: Berghahn Books. Pp. 54-73.

Nepstad, D., B.S. Soares-Filho, F. Merry, A. Lima., P. Moutinho, J. Carter, M, Bowman, A. Cattaneo, H. Rodrigues, S. Schwartzman, D.G. McGrath, C.M. Stickler, R. Lubowski., P. Piris-Cabezas, S. Rivero, A. Alencar, O. Almeida and O. Stella. 2009. The end of deforestation in the Brazilian amazon. Science 326(5958): 1350-1351.

Neumann, R.P. 1997. Forest rights, privileges and prohibitions: contextualising state forestry policy in colonial Tanganyika. Environment and History 3(1): 45-68.

Obidzinski, K., A. Dermawan, A. Andrianto, H. Komarudin and D. Hernawan. 2014. The Timber Legality Verification System and the Voluntary Partnership Agreement (VPA) in Indonesia: challenges for the small-scale forestry sector. Forest Policy and Economics 48: 24-32.

Okereke, C. 2008. Global justice and neoliberal environmental governance: ethics, sustainable development and international co-operation. London: Routledge.

Overbeek, H., K. Dingwerth, P. Pattberg and D. Compagnon. 2010. Forum: global governance: decline or maturation of an academic concept? International Studies Review 12(4): 696-719.

Overdevest, C. and J. Zeitlin. 2018. Experimentalism in transnational forest governance: implementing European Union Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT) Voluntary Partnership Agreements in Indonesia and Ghana. Regulation and Governance 12: 64-87.

Palmer, C. 2001. The extent and causes of illegal logging: an analysis of a major cause of tropical deforestation in Indonesia. London/Norwich: Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE).

Peluso, N.L. 1992. Rich forests, poor people: resource control and resistance in Java. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Putzel, L., A.B. Kelly, P.O. Cerutti and Y. Artati. 2015. Formalization as development in land and natural resource policy. Society and Natural Resources 28(5): 453-472.

Quijano, A. 2000. Coloniality of power and Eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology: Journal of the International Sociological Association 15(2): 215-232.

Rajagopal, B. 2003. International law from below: development, social movements and Third World resistance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Randeria, S. 2003. Cunning states and unaccountable international institutions: legal plurality, social movements and rights of local communities to common property resources. European Journal of Sociology/Archives Europeennes de Sociologie 44(1): 27-60.

Ribot, J. 1999. Decentralization, participation and accountability in Sahelian forestry: legal instruments of political-administrative control. Africa 69(1): 23-65.

Ribot, J., A. Agrawal and A.M. Larson. 2006. Recentralizing while decentralizing: how national governments reappropriate forest resources. World Development 34: 1864-1886.

Ribot, J., A. Chhatre and T. Lankinad. 2008. Introduction: institutional choice and recognition in the formation and consolidation of local democracy. Conservation and Society 6(1): 1-11.

Rutt, R., R. Myers, C.L. McDermott and S. Ramcilovik-Suominen. 2018. FLEGT: Another forestry fad? Environmental Science and Policy 89: 266-272.

Sahide, M.A.K., A. Maryudi, S. Supratman and L. Giessen. 2016. Is Indonesia utilising its international partners? The driving forces behind Forest Management Units. Forest Policy and Economics 69: 11-20.

Scott, J.C. 1987. Weapons of the weak: everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Scott, J.C. 2009. The art of not being governed: an anarchist history of upland Southeast Asia. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Setyowati, A. and C.L. McDermott. 2016. Commodifying legality? Who and what counts as legal in the Indonesian wood trade. Society and Natural Resources 30(6): 750-764.

Shapiro, S.J. 2011. Legality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Sikor, T. and C. Lund. 2009. Access and property: a question of power and authority. Development and Change 40(1): 1-22.

Slaughter, A.M. and W. Burke-White. 2006. The future of international law is domestic (or, the European Way of law). Harvard International Law Journal 47(2): 327-352.

Smith, J., K. Obidzinski, S. Subarudi and I. Suramenggala. 2003. Illegal logging, collusive corruption and fragmented governments in Kalimantan, Indonesia. International Forestry Review 5(3): 293-302.

Susanti, A. and A. Maryudi. 2016. Development narratives, notions of forest crisis, and boom of oil palm plantations in Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics 73: 130-139.

UN. 2014. New York Declaration on Forests: declaration and action agenda. New York: Climate Summit 2014.

Vandergeest, P. and N.L. Peluso. 2006. Empires of forestry: professional forestry and state power in Southeast Asia, Part 2. Environment and History 12: 359-393.

Vogel, D. 1995. Trading up: consumer and environmental regulation in a global economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wainwright, J.D. and C.L. Zempel. 2017. The colonial roots of forest extraction: rosewood exploitation in Southern Belize. Development and Change 49(1): 1-26.

Watson, A. 1992. The evolution of international society: a comparative, historical analysis. London: Routledge.

Weilenmann, M. 2009. Project law—a legal intermediary between local and global communities: a case study from Senegal. Anthropologica 51(1): 39-51.

Weimar, H., N. Janzen and M. Dieter. 2015. Market coverage of wood imports by the EU Timber Regulation. Thünen Working Paper 45. Hamburg: Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut.