Can the subaltern protect forests? REDD+ compliance, depoliticization and Indigenous subjectivities
Abstract
REDD+ regimes are accompanied by capacity-building and educational practices, which play an important role in REDD+ governance. These practices address subaltern local and indigenous actors, seek their compliance and thereby contribute to the stabilization of otherwise all-too-fragile global carbon governance systems. In this article I analyze the governing effects of such practices by drawing on Robert Fletcher's concept of "multiple environmentalities" and Tania Murray Li's "analytic of assemblage." Empirically I focus on educational materials that have been designed for REDD+ projects in cooperation with one of the world's largest REDD+ funds, Norway's International Climate and Forest Initiative. I identify several strategies that aim at aligning diverse actors, seek to de- or re-politicize REDD+ concepts, authorize knowledge, and, most significantly, address local actors as responsible ecological stewards, who contribute to stabilizing REDD+ regimes on the ground. In total, these strategies promote programmatic subjectivities among indigenous 'stakeholders' and contribute to a new, 'glocal' understanding of nature-society relations.
Keywords: global environmental governance, REDD+, governmentality, environmentality, capacity-building
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agrawal, A. 2005. Environmentality: technologies of government and the making of subjects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Angelsen, A., C. Streck, L. Peskett, J. Brown and C. Luttrell. 2008. What is the right scale for REDD? The implications of national, subnational and nested approaches. CIFOR Info Brief No. 15. Bogor: CIFOR.
Arora-Jonsson, S., L. Westholm, B.J. Temu and A. Petitt. 2015. Carbon and cash in climate assemblages: the making of a new global citizenship. Antipode 48(1): 74-96.
Asiyanbi, A., E. Ogar and O.A. Akintoye. 2019. Complexities and surprises in local resistance to neoliberal conservation: multiple environmentalities, technologies of the self and the poststructural geography of local engagement with REDD+. Political Geography 69: 128-138.
Astuti R. and A. McGregor. 2015a. Responding to the green economy: how REDD+ and the One Map Initiative are transforming forest governance in Indonesia. Third World Quarterly 36(12): 2273-2293.
Astuti R. and A. McGregor. 2015b. Governing carbon, transforming forest politics: a case study of Indonesia's REDD+ Task Force. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 56(1): 21-36.
Bäckstrand, K. and E. Lövbrand. 2006. Planting trees to mitigate climate change: contested discourses of ecological modernization, green governmentality and civic environmentalism. Global Environmental Politics 6(1): 51-71.
Bäckstrand, K. 2006. Democratizing global environmental governance? Stakeholder democracy after the World Summit on Sustainable Development. European Journal of International Relations 12(4): 467-498.
Benjaminsen, G. 2014. Between resistance and consent: project–village relationships when introducing REDD+ in Zanzibar. Forum for Development Studies 41(3): 377-398.
Boer, H. 2017. Welfare environmentality and REDD+ incentives in Indonesia. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 19(6): 795-809.
Brand, U. and M. Wissen. 2017. Imperiale lebensweise. Zur ausbeutung von mensch und natur im globalen kapitalismus. München: Oekom.
Brassett, J., S. Croft and N. Vaughan-Williams. 2013. Introduction: an agenda for resilience research in politics and international relations. Politics 33(4): 221–228.
Brockhaus, M., M. Di Gegorio and S. Mardiah. 2013. Governing the design of national REDD+: an analysis of the power of agency. Forest Policy and Economics 49: 23-33.
Cavanagh, C. and T.A. Benjaminsen. 2014. Virtual nature, violent accumulation: the 'spectacular failure' of carbon offsetting at a Ugandan National Park. Geoforum 56: 55-65.
Cavanagh, C.J., P.O. Vedeld and L.T. Trædal. 2015. Securitizing REDD+? Problematizing the emerging illegal timber trade and forest carbon interface in East Africa. Geoforum 60: 72-82.
Chomba, S.W., J. Kariuki, J.F. Lund and F. Sinclair. 2016. Roots of inequity: how the implementation of REDD+ reinforces past injustices. Land Use Policy 50: 202-213.
Danielsen, F., M. Skutsch, N.D. Burgess, H. Andrianandrasana, B. Karky, R. Lewis, J.C. Lovett, J. Massao, Y. Ngaga, P. Phartiyal, M.K. Poulsen, S.P. Singh, S. Solis, M. Sorensen, A. Tewari, R. Young and E. Zahabu. 2011. At the heart of REDD+: a role for local people in monitoring forests? Conservation Letters 4(2): 158-167.
Dean, M. 1999/2009. Governmentality: power and rule in modern society. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Death, C. 2010. Governing sustainable development. interventions. London: Routledge.
Death, C. 2011. Summit theatre: exemplary governmentality and environmental diplomacy in Johannesburg and Copenhagen. Environmental Politics 20(1): 1-19.
Dehm, J. 2016. Indigenous peoples and REDD+ safeguards: rights as resistance or as disciplinary inclusion in the green economy? Journal of Human Rights and the Environment 7(2): 170–217.
Evans, K., L. Murphy and W. de Jong. 2014. Global versus local narratives of REDD: a case study from Peru's Amazon. Environmental Science and Policy 35: 98-108.
Fletcher, R. 2010. Neoliberal environmentality: towards a poststructural political ecology of the conservation debate. Conservation and Society 8(3): 171-181.
Fletcher, R. 2017. Environmentality unbound: multiple governmentalities in environmental politics. Geoforum 85: 311-315.
Fry, B.P. 2011. Community forest monitoring in REDD+: the 'M' in MRV? Environmental Science and Policy
(2): 181-187.
Gray, I. 2017. Marketization as political technology: unintended consequences of climate finance in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Economy and Society 46(3-4): 545-575.
Goering, L. 2015. After errors, Congo Basin forest effort restarts with new scrutiny, Reuters December 8, 2015. URL: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-climatechange-summit-forest-idUSKBN0TR2YM20151208 (Accessed May 5, 2020)
Gupta, A., E. Lövbrand, E. Turnhout and M.J. Vijge. 2012. In pursuit of carbon accountability: the politics of REDD+ measuring, reporting and verification systems. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4(6): 726-731.
Hein. J. 2019. Political ecology of REDD+ in Indonesia. London: Routledge.
Hjort, M. 2019. Who should be governed to reduce deforestation and how? Multiple governmentalities at the REDD+ negotiations. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 38(1): 134-152.
Howell, A. 2015. Resilience as enhancement: governmentality and political economy beyond 'responsibilisation'. Politics 35(1): 67-71.
Howson P. 2018. Slippery violence in the REDD+ forests of Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Conservation and Society. 16: 136-146.
Isyaku, U., A. Arhin and A. Asiyanbi. 2017. Framing justice in REDD governance: centering transparency, equity and legitimacy in readiness implementation in West Africa. Environmental Conservation 44(3): 212-220.
IWGIA/International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs. 2010. What is REDD? A guide for Indigenous communities. Chiang Mai/Thailand: IWGIA Press.
IWGIA/International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs. 2011. Understanding community-based REDD+: a guide for Indigenous trainers. Chiang Mai/Thailand: IWGIA Press.
Joseph, J. 2013. Resilience as embedded neoliberalism: a governmentality approach. Resilience 1(1): 38-52.
Kewin, B., F. Kamelarczyk and C. Smith-Hall. 2014. REDD herring: epistemic community control of the production, circulation and application of deforestation knowledge in Zambia. Forest Policy and Economics 46:19-29.
Lang, C. 2013. Norway, REDD and corruption in DR Congo. Blog post at REDD-Monitor (Jan 23), URL: http://www.redd-monitor.org/2013/01/23/norway-redd-and-corruption-in-dr-congo-risks-of-corruption-will-threaten-the-implementation-of-redd-in-drc/ (Accessed March 15, 2017).
Lang, C. 2015. Corruption and REDD in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Blog post at REDD-Monitor (May 9), URL; http://www.redd-monitor.org/2015/05/09/corruption-and-redd-in-the-democratic-republic-of-congo/ (Accessed March 15, 2017)
Larrazábal, A., M.K. McCall, T.H. Mwampamba, M. Skutsch. 2012. The role of community carbon monitoring for REDD+: a review of experiences. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 4(6): 707-716.
Li, T.M. 2005. Beyond 'the State' and failed schemes. American Anthropologist 107(3): 383–394.
Li, T.M. 2007a. The will to improve: governmentality, development, and the practice of politics. Durham: Duke University Press.
Li, T.M. 2007b. Practices of assemblage and community forest management. Economy and Society 36(2): 263-293.
Li, T.M. 2007c. Governmentality. Anthropologica 49(2): 275-281.
Li, T.M. 2014. Fixing non‐market subjects: governing land and population in the Global South. Foucault Studies 18: 34‐48.
Lövbrand, E., J. Stripple, and B. Wiman. 2009. Earth system governmentality: reflections on science in the Anthropocene. Global Environmental Change 19(1): 7-13.
Luke, T.M. 1999. Environmentality as green governmentality, in Darier, E. (ed.). Discourses of the environment. Oxford: Blackwell. Pp. 121-151.
Marigold, N. 2015. Where has funding for forest protection in Central Africa gone wrong? Reuters (Nov 10, 2015), URL: http://news.trust.org/item/20151110104943-jew41 (Accessed May 8, 2020).
McGregor, A., E. Challies, P. Howson, R. Astuti, R. Dixon, B. Haalboom, M. Gavin, L. Tacconi and S. Affif. 2015. Beyond carbon, more than forest? REDD+ governmentality in Indonesia. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 47(1): 138-155.
Methmann, C., D. Rothe and B. Stephan. 2013. How to trade 'not cutting down trees': a governmentality perspective on the commodification of avoided deforestation. In Methmann, C., D. Rothe and B. Stephan (eds.). Interpretive approaches to global climate governance. London: Routledge. Pp. 71-85.
Mickels-Kokwe G. and M. Kokwe. 2015. Carbon projects and communities: dynamic encounters in Zambia. In Leach, M. and I. Scoones (eds). Carbon conflicts and forest landscapes in Africa. London: Routledge. Pp. 144-161.
Müller, F. 2016. IRENA as a glocal actor: pathways towards energy governmentality. Innovation 30(3): 306-322.
Müller, F. 2017. Produktive wälder: diffusionsmuster klimapolitischer verantwortung am beispiel von REDD+-projekten. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 52: 334-357.
Müller, F. and A. Ziai. 2017. Empowering the poor? The World Bank and subaltern articulation. Paper presented at the EADI-NORDIC Conference, Aug 20-23. Bergen.
Neimark, B., S. Mahanty, W. Dressler and C. Hicks. 2020. Not just participation: the rise of the eco‐precariat in the green economy. Antipode 52(2): 496-521.
Neimark, B. and B. Wilson. 2015. Re-mining the collections: from bioprospecting to biodiversity offsetting in Madagascar. Geoforum 66: 1-10.
Neimark, B. and L. Tilghman. 2014. Bioprospecting a biodiversity hotspot: the political economy of natural products drug discovery for conservation goals in Madagascar. In Scales, I.R. (ed.) Conservation and environmental management in Madagascar. London: Earthscan. Pp. 271-298.
Nel. A. 2015. The neoliberalisation of forestry governance, market environmentalism and re-territorialisation in Uganda. Third World Quarterly 36(12): 2294-2315.
NICFI. 2014. A strategic evaluation. Oslo: Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment.
Norad. 2012. Real-time evaluation of Norway's International Climate and Forest Initiative. Lessons learned from support to civil society organisations. Oslo: Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment.
Norad. 2014. Real-time evaluation of Norway's International Climate and Forest Initiative. Synthesising report 2007-2013. Oslo: Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment.
Norad. 2017. Real-time evaluation of Norway's International Climate and Forest Initiative. An evaluation of empowerment of indigenous peoples and forest dependent local communities through support to civil society organisations. Oslo: Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment.
Oels, A. 2005. Rendering climate change governable: from biopower to advanced liberal government? Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. 7(3): 185-207.
Paterson, M.D. and J. Stripple. 2012. Virtuous carbon. Environmental Politics 21(4): 563-582.
Pettenella D. and L. Brotto. 2012. Governance features for successful REDD+ projects organization. Forest Policy and Economics 18: 46–52.
RECOFTC. 2012. A training of trainers manual for REDD+: for community level facilitators. Bangkok/Thailand: RECOFTC Publishing.
Reid, J. 2012. The disastrous and politically debated subject of resilience. Development Dialogue 58: 67-79.
Rowe, E. W. 2015. Locating international REDD+ power relations: debating forests and trees in international climate negotiations. Geoforum 66: 64-74.
Setyowati, A.B. 2020. Governing the ungovernable: contesting and reworking REDD+ in Indonesia. Journal of Political Ecology 27
Stripple, J. and H. Bulkeley. 2015. Governmentality. In K. Bäckstrand and E. Lövbrand (eds.). Research handbook on climate governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Pp. 49-59.
Thompson, M.C., B. Manali and E.R. Carr. 2010. Seeing REDD+ as a project of environmental governance. Environmental Science and Policy 14(2): 100-110.
UN Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being – synthesis. URL: http://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf (Accessed May 8, 2020).
UNFCC. 2007. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its thirteenth session, held in Bali from 3 to 15 December 2007', FCCC/CP/2007/6/Add.1, 8.
Walbott, L. 2014. Indigenous peoples in UN REDD+ negotiations: "importing power" and lobbying for rights through discursive interplay management. Ecology and Society 19(1): 21.
Zebrowski, C. 2013. The nature of resilience. Resilience 1(3): 159-173.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2458/v27i1.23198
