The University of Arizona

NEGOTIATING LANGUAGE USE IN CALL’S FOURTH PHASE: AN INTRODUCTION TO A FUNCTIONAL APPROACH TO CODE-SWITCHING ELECTRONICALLY

Steve Daniel Przymus

Abstract


This article offers a critical discourse analysis of how language learners negotiate
language use in intercultural computer mediated communication (CMC) activities
and takes a revitalized and resituated look at code-switching (CS) for the purpose
of enhancing the public self-image of online interactants by positioning
interactants as proficient second language (L2) users. Warschauer (2000) first
proposed the idea of a “third stage” of computer assisted language learning
(CALL) where the Internet and multimedia would provide a new type of authentic
discourse and open greater opportunities for increased student agency through
social interactions (p. 64). Bax (2003) similarly argued for the conception of a
“third phase” of CALL. Bax characterized this phase as the ubiquitous use of
technology for language learning and the creation of a state of “normalization” of
technology use and integration (p. 13). This article proposes a fourth phase
(Ariew, 2014) made distinctive by its sociocultural lens used to examine what
kinds of knowledge, relationships, and identities are co-constructed through
increased intercultural CMC opportunities afforded by CALL’s ubiquitous use. I
adopt an approach informed by systemic functional linguistic (SFL) (Eggins,
2004; Halliday, 1985; Halliday & Matthiessen, 2004; Martin & Rose, 2007a,
2008) that demonstrates how language is a meaning making system in
intercultural emails. To accomplish this, I analyzed 154 emails between
participants to show how a face-saving and face-giving (Brown & Levinson,
1987; Goffman, 1967) textual flow, or mode, is created through code-switching
(CS) at the phatic-referential switch. In the final section, I introduce a CS
framework for online face-work (Park, 2008) called a Functional Approach to
Code-switching Electronically (FACE).

Keywords: code-switching, computer mediated communication, critical discourse
analysis, systemic functional linguistics


Full Text:

PDF