Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T05:17:02.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Are Coral Clasts from a Turbid Near-Shore Reef Environment a Suitable Material for Radiocarbon Analysis?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2016

Pauline Gulliver*
Affiliation:
NERC Radiocarbon Facility-East Kilbride, SUERC, Rankine Avenue, East Kilbride G75 OQF, United Kingdom
Suzanne Palmer
Affiliation:
Department of Geography and Geology, The University of the West Indies, Mona Campus, Kingston 7, Jamaica
Chris Perry
Affiliation:
College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, EX4 EPS, United Kingdom
Scott Smithers
Affiliation:
School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia
*
Corresponding author. Email: Pauline.Gulliver@glasgow.ac.uk.

Abstract

Use of coral skeletons to determine growth histories of reefs situated in warm, clear tropical waters is well established. Recently, however, there has been increasing awareness of the significance of reefs occurring in environments that are considered as marginal for coral growth, such as turbid inshore settings characterized by episodes of elevated turbidity, low light penetration, and periodic sediment burial. While these conditions are generally considered as limiting for coral growth, coral reefs in these settings can exhibit high live coral cover and species diversity, and thus can be both ecologically and geologically significant. Turbid-zone reefs are also commonly concentrated along eroding shorelines with many analogues to erosional shorelines developed during the Holocene transgression. A growing number of studies of these previously undocumented reefs reveal that the reef deposits are detrital in nature, comprising a framework dominated by reef rubble and coral clasts and set within a fine-grained terrigenous sediment matrix. In addition to the recognized effects of diagenesis or algal encrustations on the radiocarbon signature of coral samples, episodic high-energy events may rework sediments and can result in age reversals in the same stratigraphic unit. As in other reef settings, the possibility of such reworking can complicate the reconstruction of turbid-zone reef growth chronologies. In order to test the accuracy of dating coral clasts for developing growth histories of these reef deposits, 5 replicate samples from 5 separate coral clasts were taken from 2 sedimentary units in a core collected from Paluma Shoals, an inshore turbid-zone reef located in Halifax Bay, central Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Results show that where care is taken to screen the clasts for skeletal preservation, primary mineralogical structures, and δ13C values indicative of marine carbonate, then reliable 14C dates can be recovered from individual turbid reef coral samples. In addition, the results show that these individual clasts were deposited coevally.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Browne, NK, Smithers, SG, Perry, CT. 2010. Geomorphology and community structure of Middle Reef, Great Barrier Reef, Australia: an inner-shelf turbid zone reef subject to episodic mortality events. Coral Reefs 29(3):683–9.Google Scholar
Browne, NK, Smithers, SG, Perry, CT. 2012. Coral reefs of the turbid inner-shelf of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia: an environmental and geomorphic perspective on their occurrence, composition and growth. Earth-Science Reviews 115(1–2):120.Google Scholar
Browne, NK, Smithers, SG, Perry, CT. 2013. Spatial and temporal variations in turbidity on two inshore turbid reefs on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Coral Reefs 32(1):195–210.Google Scholar
Chakraborty, S, Ramesh, R. 1998. Stable isotope variations in a coral (Favia speciosa) from the Gulf of Kutch during 1948–1989 A.D.: environmental implications. Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences 107(4):331–41.Google Scholar
De Vantier, L, De'ath, G, Turak, E, Done, T, Fabricius, K. 2006. Species richness and community structure of reef building corals on the near shore reefs of the Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs 25:329–40.Google Scholar
Fabricius, K, De'ath, G, McCook, L, Turak, E, Williams, D. 2005. Changes in algal, coral and fish assemblages along water quality gradients on the inshore Great Barrier Reef. Marine Pollution Bulletin 51(1–4):384–98.Google Scholar
Freeman, SPHT, Bishop, P, Bryant, CLB, Cook, GT, Dougans, A, Ertunc, T, Fallick, A, Ganeshram, R, Maden, C, Naysmith, P, Schnabel, C, Scott, EM, Summerfield, M, Xu, S. 2007. The SUERC AMS laboratory after 3 years. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259(1):6670.Google Scholar
Gray, SC, Hein, JR. 2005. Lagoonal reef accretion, Holocene sea-level history from three atolls in the Cook Islands, Central South Pacific. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue 42:253–64.Google Scholar
Kennedy, DM, Woodroffe, CD. 2002. Fringing reef growth and morphology: a review. Earth-Science Reviews 57(3–4):255–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, DM, Woodroffe, CD. 2004. Algal encrustation and the interpretation of radiocarbon dating of coral clasts. Coral Reefs 23(4):509–13.Google Scholar
Kleypas, JA, McManus, JW, Menez, LAB. 1999. Environmental limits to coral reef development: Where do we draw the line? American Zoologist 39(1): 146–59.Google Scholar
Larcombe, P, Woolfe, JA. 1999. Increased sedimentation in the GBR will not increase coral reef accumulation at most coral reefs. Coral Reefs 18(2): 163–9.Google Scholar
Larcombe, P, Costen, A, Woolfe, KJ. 2001. The hydrodynamic and sedimentary setting of nearshore coral reefs, central Great Barrier Reef shelf, Australia: Paluma Shoals, a case study. Sedimentology 48(4): 811–35.Google Scholar
Mallela, J, Perry, CT. 2007. Calcium carbonate budgets for two coral reefs affected by different terrestrial runoff regimes, Rio Bueno, Jamaica. Coral Reefs 26(1): 129–45.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, CJ, Smith, CA, Buddemeier, RW, Bartley, JD, Maxwell, BA. 2003. Rivers, runoff and reefs. Global and Planetary Change 39:191–9.Google Scholar
Palmer, SE, Perry, CT, Smithers, SG, Gulliver, P. 2010. Internal structure and accretionary history of a near-shore, turbid-zone coral reef: Paluma Shoals, central Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Marine Geology 276(1–4): 1429.Google Scholar
Perry, CT. 2003. Structure and development of detrital reef deposits in turbid nearshore environments, Inhaca Island, Mozambique. Marine Geology 214(1–3): 142–61.Google Scholar
Perry, CT, Larcombe, P. 2003. Marginal and non-reef-building coral environments. Coral Reefs 22(4):427–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, CT, Smithers, SG. 2006. Taphonomic signatures of turbid-zone reef development: examples from Paluma Shoals and Lugger Shoal, inshore central Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 242(1–2): 120.Google Scholar
Perry, CT, Smithers, SG, Palmer, SE, Laracombe, P, Johnson, KG. 2008. 1200 year paleoecological record of coral community development from the terrigenous inner shelf of the Great Barrier Reef. Geology 36(9): 691–4.Google Scholar
Perry, CT, Smithers, SG, Johnson, KG. 2009. Long term coral community records from Lugger Shoal on the terrigenous inner-shelf of the central Great Barrier reef, Australia. Coral Reefs 28(4):941–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, SA, Opdyke, BN, Wilson, PA, Fifield, LK, Levchenko, V. 2006. Holocene evolution of the granite based Lizard Island and MacGillivray Reef systems, Northern Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs 25(4):555–65.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Baillie, MGL, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Buck, CE, Burr, GS, Edwards, RL, Friedrich, M, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Hajdas, I, Heaton, T, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, McCormac, FG, Manning, SW, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Southon, JR, Talamo, S, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J, Weyhenmeyer, CE. 2009. IntCal09 and Marine09 radiocarbon age calibration curves, 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 51(4): 1111–50.Google Scholar
Rodgers, CS. 1990. Responses of coral reefs and reef organisms to sedimentation. Marine Ecology Progress Series 62:185–202.Google Scholar
Rozanski, K, Stichler, W, Gonfantini, R, Scott, EM, Beukens, RP, Kromer, B, van der Plicht, J. 1992. The IAEA 14C intercomparison exercise 1990. Radiocarbon 34(3):506–19.Google Scholar
Sanders, D, Baron-Szabo, RC. 2005. Scleractinian assemblages under sediment input: their characteristics and relation to the nutrient input concept. Paleogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 216(1–2): 139–81.Google Scholar
Shaked, Y, Lazar, B, Marco, S, Stein, M, Tchernov, D, Agnon, A. 2005. Evolution of fringing reefs: space and time constraints from the Gulf of Aqaba. Coral Reefs 24(1):165–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smithers, SG, Larcombe, P. 2003. Late Holocene initiation and growth of a nearshore turbid-zone coral reef: Paluma Shoals, central Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Coral Reefs 22(4):499–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smithers, SG, Hopley, D, Parnell, KE. 2006. Fringing and nearshore coral reefs of the Great Barrier Reef: episodic Holocene development and future prospects. Journal of Coastal Research 22(1): 175–87.Google Scholar
Sweatman, H, Thompson, A, Delean, S, Davidson, L, Neale, S. 2007. Status of nearshore reefs of the Great Barrier Reef, 2007 MTSRF report. AIMS and Reef and Rainforest Research Centre, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.Google Scholar
Ulm, S. 2006. Australian marine reservoir effects: a guide to Australian ΔR values. Australian Archaeology 63: 5760.Google Scholar
Wang, C-H, Huang, C-Y. 1989. 11 year isotopic record in the coral Favia speciosa. Acta Oceanographica Taiwanica 24:96107.Google Scholar
Woolfe, KJ, Larcombe, P. 1998. Terrigenous sediment accumulation as a regional control on the distribution of reef carbonates. In: Camoin, GF, Davies, PJ, editors. Reefs and Carbonate Platforms in the Pacific and Indian Oceans. Oxford: Blackwell. p 295–310.Google Scholar