Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T18:37:53.865Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ABA and ABOx Radiocarbon Cross-Dating on Charcoal from Middle Pleniglacial Loess Deposits in Austria, Moravia, and Western Ukraine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2016

Paul Haesaerts ,
Freddy Damblon ,
Philip Nigst  and
Jean-Jacques Hublin
Paul Haesaerts*
Affiliation:
Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium
Freddy Damblon
Affiliation:
Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium
Philip Nigst
Affiliation:
Department of Human Evolution, Max-Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
Jean-Jacques Hublin
Affiliation:
Department of Human Evolution, Max-Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany
*
2Corresponding author. Email: paul.haesaerts@naturalsciences.be.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Four charcoal samples from loess key sites in Austria, Moravia, and western Ukraine were submitted to ABOx (acid-base oxidation) pretreatment to compare results with the classical ABA (acid-base-acid) method. For this purpose, charcoal samples already dated in Groningen laboratory were selected from 3 archaeological sites: Molodova V in western Ukraine (subunit 10–1, ∼32.6 ka BP), Willendorf II in Austria (unit C4, ∼32.1 ka BP and unit C8, ∼38.9 ka BP) and Vedrovice V in Moravia (unit 4, upper part of Bohunice soil, ∼39.5 ka BP). Each selected charcoal sample has been homogenized and divided into 3 subsamples, which were submitted to ABA in Groningen and to ABA and ABOx pretreatments in Oxford. The results show that the ABOx dates are older than the ABA dates. Nevertheless, down to ∼40 ka BP ABOx and Groningen ABA dates appear in good agreement within a time interval of ∼1 millennium at 1σ. However, Groningen ABA pretreatment produces older dates than the Oxford ABA pretreatment. Both Oxford ABOx and Groningen ABA pretreatments provide sets of dates in good agreement with the chronological background of each selected site.

Type
Articles
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 55 , Issue 2: Proceedings of the 21st International Radiocarbon Conference (Part 1 of 2) , 2013 , pp. 641 - 647
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ascough, P, Bird, MI, Meredith, W, Wood, RE, Snape, CE, Brock, F, Higham, TF, Large, DJ, Apperley, DC. 2010. Hydropyrolysis: implications for radiocarbon pretreatment and characterization of black carbon. Radiocarbon 52(3): 1336–50.Google Scholar
Bird, MI, Ayliffe, LK, Fifield, LK, Turney, CM, Cresswell, RG, Barrows, TT, David, B. 1999. Radiocarbon dating of “old” charcoal using a wet oxidation, stepped-combustion procedure. Radiocarbon 41(2): 127–40.Google Scholar
Brock, F, Higham, TFG 2009. AMS radiocarbon dating of Paleolithic-aged charcoal from Europe and the Mediterranean Rim using ABOx-SC. Radiocarbon 51(2): 839–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51(1):337–60.Google Scholar
Damblon, F, Haesaerts, P. 2002. Anthracology and radio-chronology of the Upper Pleistocene in the loessic areas of Eurasia. In: Thiébault, S, editor. Charcoal Analysis. Methodological Approaches, Palaeoecological Results and Wood Uses. BAR International Series 1063. Oxford: Archaeopress. p 65–71.Google Scholar
Damblon, F, Haesaerts, P, van der Plicht, J. 1996. New datings and considerations on the chronology of Upper Palaeolithic sites in the Great Eurasian Plain. Préhistoire Européenne Liège 9:177–231.Google Scholar
Douka, K, Higham, T, Sinitsyn, A. 2010. The influence of pretreatment chemistry on the radiocarbon dating of Campanian Ignimbrite-aged charcoal from Kostenki 14 (Russia). Quaternary Research 73(3):583–7.Google Scholar
Haesaerts, P, Borziac, IA, Chirica, V, Damblon, F, Koulakovska, L, van der Plicht, J. 2003. The East Carpathian loess record: a reference for the Middle and Late Pleniglacial stratigraphy in central Europe. Quaternaire Paris 14(3): 163–88.Google Scholar
Haesaerts, P, Borziac, I, Chekha, VP, Chirica, V, Damblon, F, Drozdov, NI, Orlova, LA, Pirson, S, van der Plicht, J. 2009. Climatic signature and radiocarbon chronology of Middle and Late Pleniglacial loess from Eurasia: comparison with the marine and Greenland records. Radiocarbon 51(1):301–18.Google Scholar
Haesaerts, P, Borziac, I, Chekha, VP, Chirica, V, Drozdov, NI, Koulakovska, L, Orlova, LA, van der Plicht, J, Damblon, F. 2010. Charcoal and wood remains for radiocarbon dating Upper Pleistocene loess sequences in Eastern Europe and Central Siberia. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 29(1–2): 106–27.Google Scholar
Haesaerts, P, Damblon, F, Bachner, M, Trnka, G. 1996. Revised stratigraphy and chronology of the Willendorf II sequence, Lower Austria. Archaeologia Austriaca 80: 25–42.Google Scholar
Higham, T. 2011. European Middle and Upper Palaeolithic radiocarbon dates are often older than they look: problems with previous dates and some remedies. Antiquity 85(327):235–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jöris, O, Street, M. 2008. At the end of the 14C time scale–the Middle to Upper Paleolithic record of western Eurasia. Journal of Human Evolution 55(5):782–802.Google Scholar
Nigst, P, Haesaerts, P. 2012. L'Aurignacien en Basse Autriche: résultats préliminaires de l'analyse technologique de la couche culturelle 3 de Willendorf et ses implications pour la chronologie du Paléolithique supérieur ancien en Europe centrale. L'Anthropologie 116:575–608.Google Scholar
Nigst, PR, Viola, TB, Haesaerts, P, Blockley, S, Damblon, F, Frank, C, Fuchs, M, Götzinger, M, Hambach, U, Mallol, C, Moreau, L, Niven, L, Richards, M, Richter, D, Zöller, L, Trnka, G, Hublin, JJ. 2008. New research on the Aurignacian of Central Europe: a first note on the 2006 fieldwork at Willendorf II. Quartär 55:9–15.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Baillie, MGL, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Buck, CE, Burr, GS, Edwards, RL, Friedrich, M, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Hajdas, I, Heaton, T, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, McCormac, FG, Manning, SW, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Southon, JR, Talamo, S, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J, Weyhenmeyer, CE. 2009. IntCal09 and Marine09 radiocarbon age calibration curves, 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 51(4): 1111–50.Google Scholar
Valoch, K. 1993. Vedrovice V, eine Siedlung des Szeletien in Südmähren. Quartär 43/44:7–93.Google Scholar
van der Plicht, J, Wijma, S, Aerts, AT, Pertuisot, MH, Meijer, HAJ. 2000. Status report: the Groningen AMS facility. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 172(1–4):58–65.Google Scholar