Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T15:51:35.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiocarbon Dating and Authentication of Ethnographic Objects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2016

P Richardin  and
N Gandolfo
P Richardin*
Affiliation:
Centre de Recherche et de Restauration des Musées de France (C2RMF), Palais du Louvre, Porte des Lions, 14 quai François Mitterrand, 75001 Paris, France
N Gandolfo
Affiliation:
Centre de Recherche et de Restauration des Musées de France (C2RMF), Palais du Louvre, Porte des Lions, 14 quai François Mitterrand, 75001 Paris, France
*
1Corresponding author. Email: pascale.richardin@culture.gouv.fr.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article describes the contribution of the radiocarbon dating method to the authentication of ethnographic objects on some significant examples coming from the collections of the Quai Branly Museum (Paris, France) and the Museum of African Arts (Marseilles, France). The first object is a bludgeon of hard wood from the Tupinambá ethnic group and thought to be brought from Brazil by Andre Thévet, cosmographer of King Francis I. This object supposedly dates to the 16th century. Another example concerns a series of architectural columns, brought from Peru in 1910 by Captain Paul Berthon from the archaeological site of Pachacamac, the largest sanctuary on the central coast of Peru. These pieces have induced a strong reaction in the French scientific community, which has described them as “some vulgar fake” because of a particular decoration and also their unique typology. We will present also the dating of 2 Tibetan textiles and 2 pre-Columbian ponchos made with feathers, which were not well documented. The last example concerns a decorated skull covered with a mosaic of blue and black turquoises and belonging to a civilization predating the Aztecs (AD 1300–1500). All these examples illustrate the decisive contribution of 14C dating to the authentication of museum objects that lack information about their origin.

Type
Unusual Applications of 14C Measurement
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 55 , Issue 3: Proceedings of the 21st International Radiocarbon Conference (Part 2 of 2) , 2013 , pp. 1810 - 1818
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous. 1911a. Actes de la société. Journal de la Société des Américanistes 7:243–58.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1911b. Actes de la société. Journal de la Société des Américanistes 8:271–82.Google Scholar
Bergeaud, C. Forestier, S, Sindaco Domas, C, Cevoli, D. 2006. Un thang-ka double face: restauration et muséographie. Technè 23:93–7.Google Scholar
Brock, F, Ostapkowicz, J, Bronk Ramsey, C, Wiedenhorft, AC, Cartwright, C. 2012. Paired dating of pith and outer edge (terminus) samples from Prehispanic Caribbean wooden sculptures. Radiocarbon 54(3–4): 677–88.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51(1):337–60.Google Scholar
Calligaro, T, Coquinot, Y, Dumora, C, Le Hô, A-S, Langlois, J, Gandolfo, N, Richardin, P. 2011. Etude scientifique: analyse et datation des matériaux. In: Xihuitl. Images en Manœuvres. p 24–37.Google Scholar
Cottereau, E, Arnold, M, Moreau, C, Baqué, D, Bavay, D, Caffy, I, Comby, C, Dumoulin, JP, Hain, S, Perron, M, Salomon, J, Setti, V. 2007. Artemis, the new 14C AMS at LMC14 in Saclay, France. Radiocarbon 49(2):291–9.Google Scholar
Eeckhout, P. 1997. Pachacamac durant l'Intermédiaire récent. Étude d'un site monumental préhispanique de la Côte centrale du Pérou [PhD thesis]. Brussels: Free University.Google Scholar
Lavier, C, Borel, T, Vigears, D. 2009. Traceology applied to wooden artefacts and works of art in French national museums: initial examples of adaptations, technical developments and results at C2RMF. Technè 29: 15–20.Google Scholar
Longin, R. 1971. New method of collagen extraction for radiocarbon dating. Nature 230(5291):241–2.Google Scholar
Mazel, V, Richardin, P, Debois, D, Touboul, D, Cotte, M, Brunelle, A, Walter, P, Laprévote, O. 2008. The patinas of the Dogon-Tellem statuary: a new vision through physico-chemical analyses. Journal of Cultural Heritage 9(3):347–53.Google Scholar
McCormac, FG, Hogg, AG, Blackwell, PG, Buck, CE, Higham, TFG, Reimer, PJ. 2004. SHCal04 Southern Hemisphere calibration 0–11.0 cal kyr BP. Radiocarbon 46(3):1087–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metraux, A. 1932. A propos de deux objets Tupinambis. Bulletin du Musée d'Ethnographie du Trocadéro 3:18.Google Scholar
Moutarde, F. 2006. L'évolution du couvert ligneux et son exploitation par l'homme dans la vallée du Lurín (côte centrale du Pérou), de l'Horizon Ancien (900–100 av. J.-C.) à l'Horizon Tardif (1460–1532 ap. J.-C.) [PhD thesis]. University of Paris 1, Archaeology and Environment. 509 p.Google Scholar
Ostapkowicz, J, Bronk Ramsey, C, Brock, F, Higham, T, Wiedenhoeft, AC, Ribechini, E, Lucejko, JJ, Wilson, S. 2012. Chronologies in wood and resin: AMS 14C dating of pre-Hispanic Caribbean wood sculpture. Journal of Archaeological Science 39(7):2238–51.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Baillie, MGL, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Buck, CE, Burr, GS, Edwards, RL, Friedrich, M, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Hajdas, I, Heaton, TJ, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, McCormac, FG, Manning, SW, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Southon, JR, Talamo, S, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J, Weyhenmeyer, CE. 2009. IntCal09 and Marine09 radiocarbon age calibration curves, 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 51(4): 1111–50.Google Scholar
Richardin, P, Gandolfo, N, Moignard, B, Lavier, C, Moreau, C, Cottereau, E. 2010a. Centre of Research and Restoration of the Museums of France: AMS radiocarbon dates list 1. Radiocarbon 52(4):1689–700.Google Scholar
Richardin, P, Cuisance, F, Buisson, N, Asensi-Amoros, V, Lavier, C. 2010b. AMS radiocarbon dating and scientific examination of high historical value manuscripts: application to two Chinese manuscripts from Dunhuang. Journal of Cultural Heritage 11(4):398–403.Google Scholar
Richardin, P, Gandolfo, N, Carminatti, P, Walter, P. 2011. A new protocol for radiocarbon dating of hair and keratin type samples – application to an Andean mummy from the National Museum of Natural History in Paris. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 3(4): 379–84.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Reimer, PJ. 1993. Extended 14C data base and revised CALIB 3.0 14C age calibration program. Radiocarbon 35(1):215–30.Google Scholar
Van Strydonck, M, van der Borg, K, de Jong, A. 1992. Dating Precolumbian museum objects. Radiocarbon 34(3):928–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar