The University of Arizona

Bilingually traversing the US/Mexico "wall" via a classroom telecollaborative exchange: Translanguaging online with the Functional Approach to Code-switching Electronically (FACE)

Steve Daniel Przymus

Abstract


This study proposes to make the concept of translanguaging online accessible for teachers who wish to connect their classrooms with students in other countries via telecollaboration projects. I explore the role of instructed code-switching, as a strategic and intentional translanguaging strategy, for developing learners’ symbolic competence and in promoting the kind of communication in transnational telecollaboration projects that leads to positive bilingual identity and language development.  The majority of telecollaboration projects reported in the literature describe projects at the university language classroom setting and the varied dysfunctions that may lead to “failed communication” (O’Dowd & Ritter, 2013) or “missed communication” (Ware, 2005).  In contrast, the study within describes the successful impact of a pedagogical intervention, the Functional Approach to Code-switching Electronically (FACE) (Author, 2014), that fostered intercultural understanding among public high school students in an American Government class in the Southwestern United States and students in an English as a Foreign Language (EFL) class in the Central Pacific Coast of Mexico. Findings demonstrate how teachers can adopt translanguaging practices in their classrooms by instructing the purposeful use of code-switching for facilitating the development of students’ L2, content acquisition, symbolic competence, and positive identities as bilinguals.  In doing so, students are given the strategies needed to successfully play within the power games situated across semi-anonymous online borders, walls, and contact zones (Vinall, 2010).


Keywords


Code-switching; Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL); face; Functional Approach to Code-switching Electronically (FACE); Phatic Communication; Referential Communication; Symbolic Competence; Translanguaging

Full Text:

PDF HTML

References


Androutsopoulos, J. (2007). Bilingualism in the mass media and on the internet. In Bilingualism: A social approach (pp. 207-230). Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Androutsopoulos, J. (2013). Code-switching in computer-mediated communication. Pragmatics of computer-mediated communication, 659-686.

Arthur, J., & Martin, P. (2006). Accomplishing lessons in postcolonial classrooms: Comparative perspectives from Botswana and Brunei Darussalam. Comparative education, 42(02), 177-202.

Belz, J. A. (2002). Social dimensions of telecollaborative foreign language study. Lan- guage Learning & Technology, 6 (1), 60-81. Retrieved August 17, 2005, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num1/BELZ/default.html

Belz, J. A. (2005). Intercultural questioning, discovery and tension in Internet-mediated language learning partnerships. Language and Intercultural Communication, 5(1), 3-39.

Belz, J. A., & Müller-Hartmann, A. (2002). Deutsch-amerikanische Telekollaboration im Fremdsprachenunterricht—Lernende im Kreuzfeuer der institutionellen Zwän- ge. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, 35 (1), 68-78.

Belz, J. A., & Müller-Hartmann, A. (2003). Teachers negotiating German-American tele- collaboration: Between a rock and an institutional hard place. Modern Language Journal, 87 (1), 71-89.

Belz, J. A. & S. L. Thorne (2006). Introduction: Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education and the intercultural speaker. In J. A. Belz & S. Thorne (eds.), Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education. Boston, MA: Thomson Heinle, iix–xxv.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

Creese, A., & Blackledge, A. (2010). Translanguaging in the bilingual classroom: A pedagogy for learning and teaching?. The Modern Language Journal, 94(1), 103-115.

Eggins, S. (2004). Introduction to systemic functional linguistics. A&C Black.

Fant, L., & Grindsted, A. (1995). Conflict and consensus in Spanish vs. Scandinavian negotiation interaction. Hermes Journal of Linguistics, 15, 111-141.

García, O., & Sylvan, C. E. (2011). Pedagogies and practices in multilingual classrooms: Singularities in pluralities. The Modern Language Journal, 95(3), 385-400.

Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work: an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes.

Grindsted, A. (1994). The impact of cultural styles on negotiation: a case study of Spaniards and Danes. Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions on, 37(1), 34-38.

Grindsted, A. (1995). Dyadic and polyadic sequencing patterns in Spanish and Danish negotiation interaction. The discourse of business negotiation, 8, 203.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The Social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold/Baltimore, MD: University Park press.

Jakobson, R. (1990). The speech event and the functions of language. On language, 69-79.

Kramsch, C. (2000). Authenticity and authorship in the computer-mediated acquisition of L2 literacy. Language Learning & Technology, 4(2), 78-104.

Kramsch, C. (2006). From communicative competence to symbolic competence. The Modern Language Journal, 90(2), 249-252.

Kramsch, C., & Thorne, S. (2002). Foreign language learning as global communicative practice. Globalization and language teaching, 83-100.

Kramsch, C., & Whiteside, A. (2008). Language ecology in multilingual settings. Towards a theory of symbolic competence. Applied linguistics, 29(4), 645-671.

Lantolf, J. P., & Pavlenko, A. (2001). (S)econd (L)anguage (A)ctivity theory: Understanding second language learners as people. In M. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 141-158). New York: Longman.

Martin, J. R. (2000). Close reading: functional linguistics as a tool for critical discourse analysis. Researching language in schools and communities: functional linguistic perspectives. L. Unsworth. London, Cassell: 275-302.

Müller-Hartmann, A. (2000a). The role of tasks in promoting intercultural learning in electronic learning networks. Language Learning & Technology, 4(2), 129-147.

O’Dowd, R. (2003). Understanding ‘the other side’: Intercultural learning in a Spanish- English e-mail exchange. Language Learning & Technology, 7 (2), 118-144. Re- trieved August 17, 2005, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/odowd/default.html

O’Dowd, R. (2005). Negotiating sociocultural and institutional contexts: The case of Span- ish-American telecollaboration. Language and Intercultural Communication, 5 (1), 40-56.

O'Dowd, R., & Ritter, M. (2013). Understanding and working with'failed communication'in telecollaborative exchanges. CALICO journal, 23(3), 623-642.

Otheguy, R., García, O., & Reid, W. (2015). Clarifying translanguaging and deconstructing named languages: A perspective from linguistics. Applied Linguistics Review, 6(3), 281-307.

Park, J. R. (2008). Linguistic politeness and face‐work in computer‐mediated communication, Part 1: A theoretical framework. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(13), 2051-2059.

Placencia, M. E. (1998). Pragmatic variation: Ecuadorian Spanish vs. Peninsular Spanish. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 71-106.

Placencia, M. E. (2005). Pragmatic variation in corner store interactions in Quito and Madrid. Hispania, 583-598.

Przymus, S. (2014). Negotiating language use in CALL's fourth phase: Introducing a Functional Approach to Code-switching Electronically (FACE). Arizona Working Papers in SLA & Teaching, 21

Przymus, S. (2016). Challenging the monolingual paradigm in secondary dual-language instruction: Reducing language-as-problem with the 2–1-L2 model. Bilingual Research Journal, 39(3-4), 279-295.

Thorne, S. L., & Black, R. W. (2007). Language and literacy development in computer-mediated contexts and communities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 133-160.

Tsiplakou, S. (2010). Doing (bi) lingualism: Language alternation as performative construction of online identities. Pragmatics, 19(3).

Vinall, K. (2010). The limits of communicative language teaching: Symbolic competence and the multiplicity of meaning. Unpubl.paper.

Ware, P. (2005). Missed” communication in online communication: Tensions in a German-American telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 9(2), 64-89.

Ware, P. D., & Kramsch, C. (2005). Toward an intercultural stance: Teaching German and English through telecollaboration. Modern Language Journal, 190-205.

Warschauer, M., & Grimes, D. (2007). Audience, authorship, and artifact: The emergent semiotics of Web 2.0. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 1-23.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.