The University of Arizona

Who owns the flows? Distinguishing ownership of resource flows from ownership of resource stocks clarifies debates about property bundles, commons tragedies, and degrowth

Tilman Hartley

Abstract


Theories of ownership have long focussed on the institutions governing resource stocks such as land, and largely neglected the ownership of resource flows such as the crops that flow from that land. Originating among early modern legal scholars, the assumption that the paradigm form of ownership was of land has been inherited by later theorists. The 'tragedy of the commons' thesis, for example, conflates the absence of stock ownership with the absence of flow ownership, and several commons scholars have now started to move away from a stock-centric conception of ownership. The same assumption has also been inherited by theorists applying Heinsohn and Steiger's 'property economics' to theories of degrowth. Here, I recast their theory to include ownership of flows as well as stocks, answering critics who point out that their theory cannot account for unsecured debts. This recasting places greater focus on the different ways in which ownership institutions not only assign an owner to a resource, but also motivate the transfer of resources between individuals. This prompts a new way to frame a key question for theorists of degrowth: in a nongrowing economy where fewer transfers can be motivated by the likelihood of receiving returns on loans, will this result in more possessive behaviours, in more communal ownership norms of reciprocity, or in more command ownership through coercion and status? Existing theory, focussed on stocks, groups these different institutions together as 'private' or 'nonproperty' ownership. This article suggests that disambiguation of the different 'nonproperty' institutions that govern the ownership and transfer of resource flows is key to better understanding the political and institutional implications of degrowth.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams, R. M. 2006. Shepherds at Umma in the Third Dynasty of Ur: interlocutors with a world beyond the scribal field of ordered vision. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 49: 133–169.

Alexander, G. S. 1997. Commodity and propriety: competing visions of property in American legal thought, 1776-1970. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Alexander, S. 2011. Property beyond growth: toward a politics of voluntary simplicity. Ph.D. dissertation, Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne.

Appell, G. N. 1993. Hardin's Myth of the Commons: the tragedy of conceptual confusions. Working paper 8. Social Transformation and Adaptation Institute.

Binswanger, H. C. 2013. The growth spiral: money, energy, and imagination in the dynamics of the market process. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Science and Business Media.

Blackstone, W. 1765–1769. Commentaries on the laws of England. 4 vols. New Haven, CT: The Avalon Project at Yale Law School.

Calvo-Mendieta, I., O. Petit, and F.-D. Vivien. 2017. Common patrimony: a concept to analyze collective natural resource management. The case of water management in France. Ecological Economics 137: 126–132.

Ciriacy-Wantrup, S. V. and R. C. Bishop. 1975. 'Common property' as a concept in natural resources policy. Natural Resources Journal 15(4): 713–727.

Coase, R. H. 1960. The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3(1): 1–44.

Cole, D. H. and E. Ostrom. 2010. The variety of property systems and rights in natural resources. In Cole D. H. and M. D. McGinnis (eds.) Elinor Ostrom and the Bloomington School of Political Economy. Vol. 2. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

Daly, H. E. and J. Farley. 2011. Ecological economics: principles and applications. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Island Press.

DeVore, J. 2015. The landless invading the landless: participation, coercion, and agrarian social movements in the Cacao lands of Southern Bahia, Brazil. The Journal of Peasant Studies 42(6): 1201–1223.

DeVore, J. 2017. Trees and springs as social property: a perspective on degrowth and redistributive democracy from a Brazilian squatter community. Journal of Political Ecology 24: 644–666.

Dove, J. A. 2014. Financial markets, fiscal constraints, and municipal debt: lessons and evidence from the Panic of 1873. Journal of Institutional Economics 10 (01): 71–106.

Ellickson, R. C. 1991. Order without law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Ellickson, R. C. 1993. Property in land. Yale Law Journal 102(6): 1315–1400.

Farley, J. 2012. The economics of sustainability. In Cabezas, H. and U. Diwekar (eds.) Sustainability: multi-disciplinary perspectives. Sharjah: Bentham Science.

Garfinkle, S. J. 2004. Shepherds, merchants, and credit: some observations on lending practices in Ur III Mesopotamia. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 47(1): 1–30.

Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1965. The institutional aspects of peasant communities: an analytical view. In Georgescu-Roegen, N. Energy and Economic Myths. New York, NY: Pergamon Press.

Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1971. The entropy law and the economic process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Gerber, J.-D. and J.-F. Gerber. 2017. Decommodification as a foundation for ecological economics. Ecological Economics 31: 551–556.

Gerber, J.-F. 2014. The role of rural indebtedness in the evolution of capitalism. Journal of Peasant Studies 41(5): 729–747.

Gerber, J.-F. and A. Scheidel. 2018. In search of substantive economics: comparing today's two major socio-metabolic approaches to the economy – MEFA and MuSIASEM. Ecological Economics 144: 186–194.

Gerber, J.-F. and R. Steppacher. 2017. Basic principles of possession-based economies. Anthropological Theory 17(2): 217–238.

Giampietro, M., K. Mayumi, and J. Ramos-Martin. 2009. Multi-scale integrated analysis of societal and ecosystem metabolism (MuSIASEM): theoretical concepts and basic rationale. Energy 34(3): 313–322.

Graeber, D. 2011. Debt: the first 5000 Years. Brooklyn, NY: Melville House Printing.

Haberl, H. 2015. Competition for land: a sociometabolic perspective. Ecological Economics 119: 424–431.

Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162(3859): 1243–1248.

Hardin, G. 1991. The tragedy of the unmanaged commons: population and the disguises of providence. In Andelson, R. V. Commons without tragedy: protecting the environment from overpopulation – a new approach. London: Shepheard-Walwyn.

Heinsohn, G. 2008. Where does the market come from? In Steiger, O. (ed.) Property economics: property rights, creditor's money and the foundations of the economy. Marburg, Germany: Metropolis.

Heinsohn, G. and O. Steiger. 2000. The property theory of interest and money. In Smithin, J. (ed.) What is money? New York, NY: Routledge.

Heinsohn, G. and O. Steiger. 2003. The property theory of interest and money. In Hodgson, G. M. (ed.) Recent developments in institutional economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Heinsohn, G. and O. Steiger. 2008. Collateral and own capital: the missing links in the theory of the rate of interest and money. In Steiger (ed.) Property Economics. Marburg, Germany: Metropolis.

Heinsohn, G. and O. Steiger. 2013. Ownership economics. Ed. and trans. by F. Decker. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.

Hohfeld, W. N. 1913. Some fundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning. Yale Law Journal 23(1): 16–59.

Hohfeld, W. N. 1917. Fundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning. Yale Law Journal 26(8): 710–770.

Honoré, A. M. 1961. Ownership. In Guest, A. G. (ed.) Oxford essays in jurisprudence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Hoskins, W. G. and L. D. Stamp. 1963. The common lands of England and Wales. London, England: Collins.

Hudson, M. 2000. How interest rates were set, 2500 BC-1000 AD: mas, tokos and foenus as metaphors for interest accruals. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 43(2): 132–161.

Hudson, M. 2002. Reconstructing the origins of interest-bearing debt. In Hudson, M. and M. Van de Mieroop (eds.) Debt and economic renewal in the ancient Near East. Bathesda, MD: Capital Decisions Limited.

Kallis, G., F. Demaria, and G. D'Alisa, eds. 2015. Degrowth: a vocabulary for a new era. New York, NY: Routledge.

Kanngiesser, P., F. Rossano, and M. Tomasello. 2015. Late emergence of the first possession heuristic: evidence from a small-scale culture. Child Development 86(4): 1282–1289.

Katz, L. 2008. Exclusion and exclusivity in property law. University of Toronto Law Journal 58(3): 275–315.

Kirkpatrick, L. O. 2016. The new urban fiscal crisis: finance, democracy, and municipal debt. Politics and Society 44(1): 45–80.

Klein, D. B. and J. Robinson. 2011. Property: a bundle of rights? Prologue to the Property Symposium. Econ Journal Watch 8(3): 193–204.

Lau, J. Y. and J. Smithin. 2002. The role of money in capitalism. International Journal of Political Economy 32(3); 5–22.

Libecap, G. D. 2007. Assigning property rights in the common pool: implications of the prevalence of first-possession rules for ITQs in fisheries. Marine Resource Economics 22(4): 407–423.

Lueck, D. 1995. The rule of first possession and the design of the law. Journal of Law and Economics 38(2): 393–436.

Lueck, D. 1998. First possession. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law 2: 132–144.

McGinnis, M. D. 2011. An introduction to IAD and the language of the Ostrom Workshop: a simple guide to a complex framework. Policy Studies Journal 39(1): 169–183.

McKean, M. A. 2000. Common property: what is it, what it is good for, and what makes it work. In Gibson, C. C., M. A. McKean, and E. Ostrom People and Forests: Communities, Institutions, and Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Meyer, J. M. 2009. The concept of private property and the limits of the environmental imagination. Political Theory 37(1): 99–127.

M'Gonigle, R. M. 1999. Ecological economics and political ecology: towards a necessary synthesis. Ecological Economics 28(1): 11–26.

Munro, J. H. 2003. The medieval origins of the financial revolution: usury, rentes, and negotiability. International History Review 25(3): 505–562.

Noonan, J. T. 1957. The scholastic analysis of usury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Ostrom, E. 2005. Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Ostrom, E. 2011. Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Studies Journal 39(1): 7–27.

Penner, J. E. 1997. The idea of property in law. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Pipes, R. 1999. Property and freedom: the story of how through the centuries private ownership has promoted liberty and the rule of law. New York, NY: Alfred Knopf.

Rose, C. M. 1985. Possession as the origin of property. University of Chicago Law Review 52(1): 73–88.

Rose, C. M. 1994. Property and persuasion: essays on the history, theory, and rhetoric of ownership. Boulder, CO: Westview.

Rose, C. M. 1998. Canons of property talk, or, Blackstone's anxiety. Yale Law Journal 108(3): 601–632.

Samuelson, P. A. 1954. The pure theory of public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics: 387–389.

Sanchez Bajo, C. 2011. Capital and the debt trap: learning from cooperatives in the Global Crisis. New York, NY: Springer.

Singer, J. W. 2008. Entitlement: the paradoxes of property. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Steiger, O. 2006. Property Economics versus New Institutional Economics: alternative foundations of how to trigger economic development. Journal of Economic Issues 40(1): 183–208.

Steppacher, R. and P. van Griethuysen. 2008. The differences between biotic and mineral resources and their implications for the conservation-climate debate. Policy Matters 16.

Storck, T. 2009. Is usury still a sin? Communio: International Catholic Review 36(3): 447–474.

Strunz, S., B. Bartkowski, and H. Schindler. 2015. Is there a monetary growth imperative? UFZ Discussion Papers 5/2015.

Strunz, S., B. Bartkowski, and H. Schindler. 2017. Is there a monetary growth imperative? In Victor, P. and B. Dolter, Handbook on growth and sustainability. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Temper, L. 2016. Who gets the HANPP (Human Appropriation of Net Primary Production)? Biomass distribution and the bio-economy in the Tana Delta, Kenya. Journal of Political Ecology 23(1): 410–433.

Underkuffler, L. S. 2003. The idea of property: its meaning and power. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Van Griethuysen, P. 2012. Bona diagnosis, bona curatio: how property economics clarifies the degrowth debate. Ecological Economics 84: 262–269.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2458/v25i1.22961